Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is October 6, 2015
home newssports feature opinion fyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » May 7, 2013 » Carbon County News » Shallow ditch has profound issues for Helper project
Published 882 days ago

Shallow ditch has profound issues for Helper project

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Sun Advocate associate editor

The fate of a little irrigation ditch on Helper's west side is posing some deep questions of law, fairness and public finance for the city's government.

It is the Bryner-Ploutz ditch, serving 26 customers with 31 connections inside city limits on the west side. As the city's multimillion-dollar reconstruction of water, sewer and storm drainage moves into that section of town, the little canal stands a good chance of disappearing.

If that happens, water rights older than both Utah statehood and the incorporation of Helper City will be in jeopardy.

John Jones, a Carbon County commissioner speaking as a private citizen at Thursday's city council meeting, warned the council that Utah law holds that water rights are property rights.

"The law says you can't impair delivery of water rights," he declared.

On the other hand, City Attorney Gene Strate told the council that the city may not be able to commit any funds from its improvement bonds to replace the ditch with pipe.

His research has found opinions that the city can only borrow money to benefit the citizens, according to state law. Bryner-Ploutz is a private corporation.

There's also a chance that by allocating some of the bond funds for the benefit of a corporation, the city bonds could lose their tax-exempt status under federal law.

And as far as Helper City or the Bryner-Ploutz company just writing a check, that is not feasible.

According to Erica Kardelis, a ditch company board member, the engineering estimate for piping the ditch is $136,000. That's more than $4,000 per customer, an expense that they would not have except for the city's project.

Kardelis also said that the in-city customers represent a third of the shareholders in the whole irrigation company. The loss of them and their revenue could endanger the survival of the whole enterprise, she said.

"We all agree you have the rights," said council member Robert Bradley. "The issue is how it is going to be paid."

With its hands apparently tied by laws governing bonds and little unrestricted cash in its coffers, the city is also strapped.

During a lengthy back-and-forth discussion of the nuances involved, at idea took shape that it might be possible for the city and the company to split the cost somehow.

Shareholder David Dornan said he could see a benefit to users to have the ditch piped and pressurized, and irrigators might be willing to invest some money in the convenience simply turning a valve to irrigated their gardens and lawns.

Rather than spend more time at its regular meeting, the council decided to conduct a special meeting Wednesday with the ditch and infrastructure situation as the only agenda items. That meeting will begin at 6 p.m.

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Top of Page

Article Photos  
Browse / enlarge – (1 total)
Print photo(s) with article
Get photo reprints on CD
NOTE: To print only the article and included photos, use the print photo(s) with article link above.
Carbon County News  
May 7, 2013
Recent Local News
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories

Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us